X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1D852702-CB83-4DAA-A31A-D3F8A01E432A@free.fr>
References:	<20110609094631 DOT 56364lzi64m7t4d3 AT messagerie DOT si DOT c-s DOT fr> <BANLkTinwkd50q5JdugNRO8wfQrJ00syD+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4DF10C13 DOT 3040208 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <BANLkTinBqCHvyRpgXpHcXD54ycPuGhrMcg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <811AA35F-E300-46E5-9FE3-EE7D5E58194B AT free DOT fr> <20110609210632 DOT GA1457 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4E1EF031-A2E0-4238-BD23-5089E2D7670F AT free DOT fr> <20110610142124 DOT GA5849 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <1D852702-CB83-4DAA-A31A-D3F8A01E432A AT free DOT fr>
From:	Edward McGuire <MetaEd AT MetaEd DOT COM>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:06:46 -0500
Message-ID:	<BANLkTikhZ+tHjNzWZNM9VKN6b0Ei84FeWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: cygcheck's understanding of TZ
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> On 2011-06-10 16:21, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> we still have no idea [...] why you find it so crucial for
>> cygcheck to report the date with pinpoint accuracy

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:44, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> Wrong by 1h is not pinpoint accuracy (i think).

I realize I don't have a vote, but I disagree with your patch. Idiot
proofing cygcheck(1) by forcing GMT on the user is overkill.
cygcheck(1) only gives invalid output when it gets invalid input.
Did cygcheck(1) and date(1) both give valid output with
TZ=CET-1CEST?

Cheers,

MetaEd

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -