delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/06/13/04:49:37

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=G6Q69DB3AUoJKS2BpLRaz8MQ2NORN7h5HRzrJMPOhRw= c=1 sm=1 a=IzDsJS3ZcTgA:10 a=gkZ03UMtN5AA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=lm4rf8pw1hzmFPYkgo0DwQ==:17 a=iVxlzXCMTOGnLzU8ZKMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lm4rf8pw1hzmFPYkgo0DwQ==:117
Message-ID: <4DF5CF06.5010701@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:49:10 -0400
From: SJ Wright <sjwright68 AT charter DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin User Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: We have a "cygstart" -- why not a "cygstop"?
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Or does such an idea go too much against the grain of "let's keep Cygwin 
as much of a Unix as possible?"

At the very least, it would cut through all the rigamorole of "kill"-ing 
pids that were likely to return errors.

Comments?

SJ Wright

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019