X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4DDEFAB6.8020407@cs.umass.edu>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2011 21:13:26 -0400
From:	Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Reply-To:	moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Does Latex/Tex install? Does Latex/Tex work? How do you get it installed? How do you get it to work?
References:	<4DDE9CFF DOT 20502 AT veritech DOT com> <4DDEA72A DOT 9040102 AT ece DOT cmu DOT edu> <4DDEA80B DOT 7080702 AT cornell DOT edu> <BANLkTimvfW3LqeAu1ngiSzv9xY0DufV+ug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BANLkTi=rA9M=Tvoc7QVDEmz8nyLDKEOAkg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4DDED692 DOT 1010706 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
In-Reply-To:	<4DDED692.1010706@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 5/26/2011 6:39 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 5/26/2011 4:47 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Dima Pasechnik  wrote:
>>> tetex is dead and buried.

> Well, hold on there, cowboy.  Jan Nieuwenhuizen is listed as the teTeX
> maintainer for cygwin; I think to proper course is to ask Jan to
> update/switch cygwin's TeX system to TeX Live, and make the case for why
> it should happen.
>
> I think "teTeX has been dead upstream for five years" is a pretty good
> argument, actually.
>
> 'Course, we haven't heard from Jan since last Novemeber
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-11/msg00422.html
> so...
>
> Jan?  You still there?

I observe that I installed and use MiKTeX, which is a native
Windows TeX/LaTeX, but I call it fine from cygwin scripts and
such without difficulty. It was a seamless cutover.  (I did it
to have a version more similar to that of some colleagues,
with whom I am working on a book.)  So ... I am not sure that
there is any great benefit to a cygwin-specific version.

Best wishes -- Eliot Moss

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -