delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Yahoo-SMTP: | Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk |
Message-ID: | <4DD537F7.4010901@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Thu, 19 May 2011 11:32:07 -0400 |
From: | "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Repeated problems with svn even after rebaseall and peflagsall on Windows 7 |
References: | <20110517011110 DOT GA22552 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <688D8B269DCBDE44A466DC43D403624C0155CCFE40 AT pfi-mail> |
In-Reply-To: | <688D8B269DCBDE44A466DC43D403624C0155CCFE40@pfi-mail> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 5/19/2011 11:25 AM, Mike Dahmus wrote: > Nope, didn't help; in fact, the rebase at 0x77000000 (whatever the > recommendation was) broke things much worse; and now even bash won't start > without a million access violations. > > Why is this even necessary anyways? Other than "because it's always been > this way"? I've been as stalwart a defender of cygwin as you'd find at my > various companies over the years but this wart is getting really hard to > ignore. In particular, since I myself can't do subversion or various other > things any more without devolving to something like (ugh) tortoise. Short answer: It's an artifact of emulating fork on Windows. Long answer: See the email archives for all the discussions about it and attempts to make this less painful. You may find that limiting the number of packages/DLLs installed helps. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |