X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	Mike Dahmus <mdahmus AT potomacfusion DOT com>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 10:25:48 -0500
Subject:	RE: Repeated problems with svn even after rebaseall and peflagsall on Windows 7
Message-ID:	<688D8B269DCBDE44A466DC43D403624C0155CCFE40@pfi-mail>
References:	<20110517011110 DOT GA22552 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20110517011110.GA22552@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Nope, didn't help; in fact, the rebase at 0x77000000 (whatever the recommen=
dation was) broke things much worse; and now even bash won't start without =
a million access violations.

Why is this even necessary anyways? Other than "because it's always been th=
is way"? I've been as stalwart a defender of cygwin as you'd find at my var=
ious companies over the years but this wart is getting really hard to ignor=
e. In particular, since I myself can't do subversion or various other thing=
s any more without devolving to something like (ugh) tortoise.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -