delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-IronPortListener: | Outbound_SMTP |
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: | true |
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: | AvEAAM63yU2cKEcU/2dsb2JhbACXW44xd6tzm1SGDwSUMoo5 |
From: | "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" <BBuchbinder AT niaid DOT nih DOT gov> |
To: | "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Date: | Tue, 10 May 2011 18:11:35 -0400 |
Subject: | RE: Who's using "CYGWIN=tty" and why? |
Message-ID: | <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209E8030CCE@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> |
References: | <20110509161028 DOT GJ27739 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209E8030CB9 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> <20110510171846 DOT GA27537 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
In-Reply-To: | <20110510171846.GA27537@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Christopher Faylor sent the following at Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:19 PM >If we changed the /dev/console to /dev/consN (where N is a unique number >for each console window) would that address your use case? Yes, it works for me if there would be a reasonably small (preferably single digit) number in the output of tty or ps. >You would not be able to do something like echo foo >/dev/cons4 and have >foo be echoed another console window though. Since I haven't been on a real Unix/POSIX machine since the late '80s, I'd forgotten about that. Now you made me want to DO it! :-) >Eliminating the special case of tty handling >would simplify the cygwin pty layer, shrink the size of the DLL, and >generally make Cygwin a little easier to maintain. Even if you don't accommodate me, that's OK, if your lives will be easier. As I wrote, if I find that I really miss tty identification, I can learn to use mintty. (Or maybe I should just switch - but not today.) Thank to you all for your work on cygwin. - Barry Disclaimer: Statements made herein are not made on behalf of NIAID. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |