X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o-
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:06:57 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	rebaseall rebasing dlls into cygwin address range?
Message-ID:	<20110421010657.GA24483@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I just noticed today that cygz.dll was rebased right into the middle of
cygwin1.dll's address range.  So, I added a -v to the rebaseall run and
saw that there were quite a few dlls stomping all over cygwin.

I wonder if this explains why we're seeing problems which are not cured
by rebase?  Maybe rebase should detect where cygwin1.dll lives and avoid
putting other DLLs there.

But, for now, just setting the base to something higher:

rebaseall -b 0x77000000

would solve some of the problems we've seen.

I don't know if that stomps on system routines or not, though.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -