X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4DA1B193.9080207@aol.com>
Date:	Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:33:07 -0700
From:	Tim Prince <n8tm AT aol DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: newlib and long-double question
References:	<BANLkTi=ud0PMGwwzRRh+hvDVcv4=nACEYA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20110409160524 DOT GA29135 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <BANLkTikd0e3xrD_NS+HFbaSmwFd-YzkBLw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BANLkTi=LAnmGNaF-MXS5ZUp23TFq9rCDoA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BANLkTi=hGQXjiEa3s2HZW+yYfC9YSaXXaQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <85C4645B18FA4D37852D725436AB741B AT desktop2> <BANLkTi=XbmP=4PaC6e6_Lbe37r5C9hz5-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E1896519D4C841C289335ECC3AD7E470 AT desktop2>
In-Reply-To:	<E1896519D4C841C289335ECC3AD7E470@desktop2>
x-aol-global-disposition:	G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:	0:2:385444992:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:	0
x-aol-sid:	3039ac1d29054da1b19431e8
X-AOL-IP:	99.13.231.72
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 4/10/2011 4:28 AM, Sisyphus wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh Myers"
>
>> The OP is trying to build Perl itself, not use it; hence the need for
>> long double support functions...
>
> You don't need "long double support functions" to build perl ... unless
> you want to build a perl whose NV is a long double (instead of a double).
>
> Presumably the op wants to build a perl whose NV is a long double so
> that he can make use of that extra precision. Given that he can't build
> such a perl, the next best way of accessing that extra precision he
> wants is, imo, to use Math::MPFR.
>
I never did see a clear description of OP's goals.  "Performance" was 
among them, so it was unclear why typical mathlinline.h content would 
have been rejected e.g.

__inline_mathcode_ (long double, __sqrtl, __x, return __builtin_sqrtl (__x))


As OP indicated, the functions might not have been difficult to write, 
perhaps not as difficult as settling requirements. If the requirement 
was for sqrtl to perform faster than sqrt, the expectation was misguided.


-- 
Tim Prince

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -