X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4D9B3A18.1050602@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:49:44 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: NTFS write-protect flag translation (tar? rsync?) only one-way?
References:	<003c01cbf364$23257e50$69707af0$@com.au>
In-reply-to:	<003c01cbf364$23257e50$69707af0$@com.au>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 4/5/2011 3:36 AM, Christian Gelinek wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a problem with the tar command with the "extract permissions
> information" option being set.
>
> I am running Cygwin (CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.8(0.236/5/3) 2011-03-01 09:36)
> under Windows 7 (Windows 7 Professional N Ver 6.1 Build 7600) with NTFS and
> the CYGWIN=ntsec environment variable.
>
> It appears that when tar reads files for adding to archives, it correctly
> interprets the Windows-set "R" attribute, which is also seen by ls under
> Cygwin. After extracting the files using tar though, only Cygwin's ls
> command seems to be aware of the read-only attribute; the attrib command (as
> well as Explorer and other Windows-apps) see and handle the file as being
> writeable.

The read-only attribute is a "Windows" thing.  Cygwin's utilities focus on
supporting POSIXy/Linuxy ways of doing things.  You can't expect Cygwin's
tools to manage all of Window's permission facilities in the same way as
Windows does.  The read-only flag is one case where you'll see a divergence.
If you need that flag set, you'll need your own wrapper to set it based on
the POSIX (or ACL) permissions.  The read-only attribute really is quite
anachronistic though IMO.  It conflicts with the more powerful ACLs.  If
you have the option, it's better not to use that flag.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -