X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<COL102-W1127E01ADC7B56DB2A8A8BB5BF0@phx.gbl>
From:	Karl M <karlm30 AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: NT4?
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:47:43 -0700
In-Reply-To:	<20110331203416.GB2606@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20110331203416 DOT GB2606 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:34:16 +0200
> From: corinna-cygwin
> Subject: NT4?
>
> Is anybody here still using Cygwin on Windows NT4 on a daily basis? I'm
> asking because we're planning to drop NT4 support entirely and I would
> like to know if there are lots of people who would be very sad if that
> happens.
>
No...Haven't even used w2k in the last five years.
=20
At some point, would there be any (significant) performance advantage to
moving (some of the) platform differences to compile time? (Not for all of
the applications, just for the Cygwin DLL and perhaps cygserver?
=20
Thanks,
=20
...Karl=20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -