X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4D94E631.6090408@sidefx.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:38:09 -0400
From:	Edward Lam <edward AT sidefx DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: NT4?
References:	<20110331203416 DOT GB2606 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20110331203416.GB2606@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 3/31/2011 4:34 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Is anybody here still using Cygwin on Windows NT4 on a daily basis?  I'm
> asking because we're planning to drop NT4 support entirely and I would
> like to know if there are lots of people who would be very sad if that
> happens.

No, but I'm curious as to what type of functionality we gain by doing so. :)

-Edward

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -