delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/03/23/15:41:09

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4D8A4CAC.2020106@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:40:28 +0000
From: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cyggfortran-3.dll broken ?
References: <AANLkTi=WaAY1HY2bZ2zKHHuCkpNE4oLCZ8cY1J=CV1Ma AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D8A1775 DOT 5020601 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A1BCD DOT 2080506 AT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTinGfQi2ad4yTbDydrzbURQATtTT4zVJWG01V5LS AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D8A214D DOT 6090409 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D8A2683 DOT 1010009 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A2E5F DOT 1040204 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D8A32B6 DOT 9050507 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A472C DOT 7040708 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
In-Reply-To: <4D8A472C.7040708@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 23/03/2011 19:17, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 3/23/2011 1:49 PM, Dave Korn wrote:

>>   Hmm, I should probably do this.  And send it upstream too.
> 
> Well, yeah (but does upstream want to explicitly require cygwin-1.7.8 or
> better? or would you conditionalize it on a configure test: 

  The latter, certainly.

  I had a quick try in my 4.3.4-4 build dir; it's a simple matter of adding an
extra.def file to the linker flags along with a counterbalancing
'--export-all-symbols' (and since we have a .map file as well this doesn't
over-export, so I don't need to make a complete .def file, handy!) and I could
conditionalize it on any one of the new HAVE_xxx definitions that are what's
causing libgfortan to exclude its own implementations in the new build, so it
doesn't seem like it should be too hard.

  I need to concentrate on fixing LTO for binutils 2.21.1 before I do anything
else.  Apologies to Marco but unless the problem gets worse I'm going back to
that and testing the gcc-4.6.0 RC2 for the next few days.  I'll try and find
some background time in which to respin 4.3.4 with forwarders added to the DLL.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019