delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BG,TW_BQ,TW_IB,TW_QR |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4D8A1F58.80103@gmail.com> |
References: | <AANLkTi=WaAY1HY2bZ2zKHHuCkpNE4oLCZ8cY1J=CV1Ma AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D8A1775 DOT 5020601 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A1BCD DOT 2080506 AT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTinGfQi2ad4yTbDydrzbURQATtTT4zVJWG01V5LS AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D8A1F58 DOT 80103 AT gmail DOT com> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:36:07 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <AANLkTimW+FtzqmXmEv7sfZ75ywDvSssqox9QX5B9d+tt@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: cyggfortran-3.dll broken ? |
From: | marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com> |
Cc: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 23/03/2011 16:19, marco atzeri wrote: > >> May be as they are now available from cygwin-1.7.8 ? > > =A0Yes indeed (and this is why I didn't see any errors during the compiler > testsuite), I just had a quick look at the libgfortran autoconfigury, it > provides replacements for those functions when the standard libm doesn't > contain them. =A0Now that they are in the cygwin dll, libgfortran doesn't= need > to provide them anymore but this has the unfortunate side-effect of break= ing > old executables, since on Windows an imported function reference in an > executable has to specify not just the function name but also the particu= lar > DLL from which the import comes. > > =A0I imagine that on ELF platforms where the executable just has a list of > undefined functions and a list of shared libs to load and the dynamic lin= ker > just satisfies an undefined symbol from whichever lib it first comes acro= ss a > definition of it, this probably works without anything needing changing. = =A0But > we're stuck I'm afraid when exports move around like this. > > =A0Sorry, looks like you'll need to respin after all. > > =A0 =A0cheers, > =A0 =A0 =A0DaveK > So I caused myself the problem as I added all those functions to cygwin.... Stay tuned for the octave respin. Ehm, may be also respin of libarpack0, liblapack0, libnetcdf6, libqrupdate0 Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |