X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BG,TW_NH,TW_XP,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4D8A1BCD.2080506@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:11:57 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cyggfortran-3.dll broken ?
References:	<AANLkTi=WaAY1HY2bZ2zKHHuCkpNE4oLCZ8cY1J=CV1Ma AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D8A1775 DOT 5020601 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4D8A1775.5020601@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 23/03/2011 15:53, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 23/03/2011 15:02, marco atzeri wrote:
>> Dave,
>> the new cyggfortran-3.dll seems to provide less export than before.
>> This breaks octave.
>>
>> Dependency walker check on octave highlight 3 functions in red
>> clogf, cexpf, csqrtf
>>
>> Is the new fortran library broken, or should I release a new octave on
>> the flight ?
> 
>   Sounds like a build error, am looking into it.

  Somehow all these have gone missing:

> $ diff -pu a b
> --- a   2011-03-23 16:10:15.093750000 +0000
> +++ b   2011-03-23 16:10:13.328125000 +0000
> @@ -1,27 +1,5 @@
> -carg
> -cargf
> -ccos
> -ccosf
> -ccosh
> -ccoshf
> -cexp
> -cexpf
> -clog
>  clog10
>  clog10f
> -clogf
> -cpow
> -cpowf
> -csin
> -csinf
> -csinh
> -csinhf
> -csqrt
> -csqrtf
> -ctan
> -ctanf
> -ctanh
> -ctanhf
>  floorl
>  fmodl
>  log10l

  Have no idea how yet but yes, you'd better roll back your libgfortran DLL to
prev: for now.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -