delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/03/18/12:23:56

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:23:40 +0100
From: David Sastre <d DOT sastre DOT medina AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problems with the new base-files-4.0-5?
Message-ID: <20110318162340.GC10633@jethro.local.lan>
References: <4D828E8E DOT 6020607 AT alice DOT it> <4D829D52 DOT 3040706 AT laposte DOT net> <20110318134646 DOT GA10633 AT jethro DOT local DOT lan> <AANLkTimo-39nG8_LjpY-vL5w65Pc8_t10gtc+TdQ0n7N AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimo-39nG8_LjpY-vL5w65Pc8_t10gtc+TdQ0n7N@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--hYooF8G/hrfVAmum
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 02:17:14PM +0000, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 18 March 2011 13:46, David Sastre wrote:
> > All [[, have been changed to a portable [ test.
> > I've changed `test -a' for a portable `test -e', and the -a operator
> > in the user's home ownership test to a chained test:
> >
> > elif [ ! -O "${HOME}" ] && [ "${HOME#/home/}" !=3D "${HOME}" ]; then ...
>=20
> Even though that home ownership test was partly my idea, I think it
> should simply be dropped, because it doesn't actually address the
> security issue it was supposed to address and the warning is likely to
> cause unnecessary alarm to users with unusual yet legitimate setups.

IIRC, the point was that some apps expect $HOME to be owned by the
user in order to operate correctly.

--=20
Huella de clave primaria: 0FDA C36F F110 54F4 D42B  D0EB 617D 396C 448B 31EB

--hYooF8G/hrfVAmum
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2DhwwACgkQYX05bESLMes2IgCfcq/tLxx3/G+04gNwfUdteYCg
0H4An1r1beOaFijvE9yc6lD6C+p0Qlkm
=Vgv9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hYooF8G/hrfVAmum--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019