delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/03/17/16:03:53

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-Id: <4D82690A.9060105@saic.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:03:22 -0400
From: "Roger K. Wells" <ROGER DOT K DOT WELLS AT saic DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1
References: <4D7FE2A7 DOT 8080409 AT xs4all DOT nl> <4D7FE57A DOT 4020903 AT redhat DOT com> <4D806DCF DOT 5090803 AT xs4all DOT nl> <4D80C0B8 DOT 8090603 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D80CEB4 DOT 7090005 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20110316154913 DOT GA18995 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4D80DEAF DOT 6020307 AT xs4all DOT nl> <4D810FAF DOT 6040609 AT t-online DOT de> <20110316193249 DOT GA15365 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4D8117FD DOT 40507 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20110316201821 DOT GA773 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4D812DBE DOT 1090607 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D81CED1 DOT 9050601 AT xs4all DOT nl> <4D820D62 DOT 4030403 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D821D89 DOT 5020105 AT xs4all DOT nl> <4D823D92 DOT 1000600 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D826761 DOT 5030302 AT xs4all DOT nl>
In-Reply-To: <4D826761.5030302@xs4all.nl>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 03/17/2011 03:56 PM, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> Op 17-3-2011 17:57, Charles Wilson schreef:
>> Final point: I realize nobody wants to maintain a non-upstreamable
>> forked version of software.  Everybody wants to be able to build
>> software on cygwin out of the box.
>>
>> So...if the upstream people really really hate --follow/--no-follow and
>> won't accept it, then maybe an all-at-once change here on cygwin would
>> be okay.  Ditto --safe.
>>
>> But...that's not an issue here, because *you* are the "upstream people"!
>>
>> So let's rephrase: What is the "upstream" objection to providing a few
>> new options, with no change in upstream's current default behavior:
>>
>>     --follow    follow symbolic links and modify the pointed-to
>>                     file. This differs from --force, which breaks
>>                     the symbolic link, replaces it with a local
>>                     copy, and modifies the copy. If --force, then
>>                     --follow has no effect.
>>
>>     --no-follow    do not follow symbolic links.  If --force, then
>>                     --no-follow has no effect.
>> ...
>>     --safe          Do not modify binary files; opposite of --force.
>>                     (default)
>>
>> Time to create the patch?  Patch requires too many internal changes that
>> are too ugly, due to internal architecture (can't imagine this is the
>> objection to --safe; that's a two-liner)?  Style?
>>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I'm willing to maintain patches for Cygwin, to make the transition 
> easier. But if there is no chance that the package gets accepted, I 
> rather save myself the trouble.
>
My 2cents worth:  I for one look forward to the new package.  All of the 
software we develop runs on both platforms and I personally use the 
dos2unix, etc tools often.  Same tools on both platforms gets my vote 
anytime.
roger wells

> best regards,
>
> Erwin
>
>
> -- 
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>


-- 
Roger Wells, P.E.
SAIC
221 Third St
Newport, RI 02840
401-847-4210 (voice)
401-849-1585 (fax)
roger DOT k DOT wells AT saic DOT com


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019