delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/03/09/15:55:25

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <4D77E92C.1030403@cygwin.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:55:08 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Rsync and FAT32
References: <AANLkTimaHtDpCDeiey5PMgXgfCLMs1EDM_0Pk_DbU3N0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D77AA45 DOT 70103 AT cygwin DOT com> <B1644C15-CE70-4525-A18D-43598F1876FB AT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <B1644C15-CE70-4525-A18D-43598F1876FB@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 3/9/2011 3:12 PM, Panos Katergiathis wrote:
> Thank you for your polite reply. The issue at hand is of a more generic
> nature and (if Google is any witness) is rather old. I am referring to the
> well known problem of cygwin (at least, when rsync is used) not properly
> handling NTFS permissions, thus resulting in folders and files that are no
> longer deletable, therefore updatable, therefore usable. I thought that, by
> using a FAT32 partition, perhaps permissions would no longer be a problem. Is
> this a valid thought?

If it were, then using the 'noacl' mount option would do the same thing
for you.  But it sounds to me (and I still have to WAG on this because I
don't know any specifics of the problem you're seeing) like if either of
above would be a valid solution for you that you should be able to get
the same or better results from using the flags that rsync provides.  But
like I said, that's just a WAG based on available information.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019