delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-id: | <4D77E92C.1030403@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:55:08 -0500 |
From: | "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-to: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Rsync and FAT32 |
References: | <AANLkTimaHtDpCDeiey5PMgXgfCLMs1EDM_0Pk_DbU3N0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D77AA45 DOT 70103 AT cygwin DOT com> <B1644C15-CE70-4525-A18D-43598F1876FB AT gmail DOT com> |
In-reply-to: | <B1644C15-CE70-4525-A18D-43598F1876FB@gmail.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 3/9/2011 3:12 PM, Panos Katergiathis wrote: > Thank you for your polite reply. The issue at hand is of a more generic > nature and (if Google is any witness) is rather old. I am referring to the > well known problem of cygwin (at least, when rsync is used) not properly > handling NTFS permissions, thus resulting in folders and files that are no > longer deletable, therefore updatable, therefore usable. I thought that, by > using a FAT32 partition, perhaps permissions would no longer be a problem. Is > this a valid thought? If it were, then using the 'noacl' mount option would do the same thing for you. But it sounds to me (and I still have to WAG on this because I don't know any specifics of the problem you're seeing) like if either of above would be a valid solution for you that you should be able to get the same or better results from using the flags that rsync provides. But like I said, that's just a WAG based on available information. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |