X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk
Message-ID:	<4D5C6195.3080808@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:45:25 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: mutt cygcheck status "Incomplete"
References:	<4D5C339D DOT 2080801 AT member DOT fsf DOT org> <4D5C35A5 DOT 5060205 AT cygwin DOT com> <4D5C3C2C DOT 9040705 AT member DOT fsf DOT org> <4D5C3E1B DOT 2000304 AT mvseac DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4D5C3E1B.2000304@mvseac.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/16/2011 4:14 PM, L Anderson wrote:
> whoops! I reread your email and realized I didn't answer the question you
> were getting at. Here is what 'mutt.sh.done' contains:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> backup_maybe() {
> if ! [ -e $1 ] || ! diff -q $1 $1.setupnew >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> mv -f $1 $1.old 2>/dev/null
> mv -f $1.setupnew $1 2>/dev/null
> else
> rm -f $1.setupnew
> fi
> }
> backup_maybe /etc/Muttrc
> backup_maybe /etc/mime.types
>

Thanks.  So this indicates that the postinstall script is moving or
removing the reported files as part of the installation process, which is
why cygcheck thinks the installation is lacking them.  So the postinstall
script should be changed to not move/remove these files.  But you don't
need to be concerned that cygcheck complains about the mutt installation.
It's fine.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -