Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/02/10/07:11:50
On 02/09/2011 07:21 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 06:43 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
>> On 2/9/2011 5:56 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 05:35 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/9/2011 5:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 02/09/2011 04:56 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/08/2011 11:07 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/8/2011 9:14 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something else I just discovered after upgrading to 1.7.7 is that
>>>>>>>> I now
>>>>>>>> have lost the ability to login via ssh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have OpenSSH installed and running sshd as a service. Both
>>>>>>>> password
>>>>>>>> and keys accepted. But now neither means will work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # ssh -i keypair1.pem Administrator AT MACHINE_IP
>>>>>>>> Last login: Fri Feb 4 17:19:26 2011 from
>>>>>>>> LOCAL_CLIENT_MACHINE
>>>>>>>> Connection to MACHINE_IP closed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I increased verbosity but did not see anything obvious.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # ssh -v -i keypair1.pem Administrator AT MACHINE_IP
>>>>>>>> OpenSSH_5.2p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8k-fips 25 Mar 2009
>>>>>>>> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
>>>>>>>> debug1: Applying options for *
>>>>>>>> debug1: Connecting to MACHINE_IP [MACHINE_IP] port 22.
>>>>>>>> debug1: Connection established.
>>>>>>>> debug1: permanently_set_uid: 0/0
>>>>>>>> debug1: identity file keypair1.pem type -1
>>>>>>>> debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version
>>>>>>>> OpenSSH_5.8
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does reverting OpenSSH to 5.7 make a difference?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Downgraded to 5.7:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bash-4.1$ sshd --version
>>>>>> sshd: unknown option -- -
>>>>>> OpenSSH_5.7p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From client:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ssh -i keypair1.pem Administrator AT MACHINE_IP
>>>>>> Last login: Wed Feb 9 12:54:08 2011 from LOCAL_CLIENT_IP
>>>>>> Connection to MACHINE_IP closed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. Still have the same problem. Connection is made but
>>>>>> immediately
>>>>>> closes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm suspecting this is related to running Cygwin 1.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> In looking back though some notes I started having bash shell problems
>>>>> after upgrading from 1.5 to 1.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now on 1.7 if I try to run bash as a login shell it just gets "Bad
>>>>> address" or segfault errors and immediately exits the shell which also
>>>>> probably affects 'ssh'.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't remember having any bash problems when I was running Cygwin
>>>>> 1.5
>>>>> on this machine. My notes reflect screen copies showing bash able to
>>>>> run as a login shell without any problem.
>>>>>
>>>> Yep, that's the way we all run by default (see cygwin.bat). I agree
>>>> that if you're having problems getting bash to behave, it's best to
>>>> focus
>>>> on that issue first. Your ssh problems may just be another symptom of
>>>> the same thing. How about sending cygcheck output
>>>> (<http://cygwin.com/problems.html>)? There may be something helpful in
>>>> that which someone on the list might pick up on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok, ran a new cygcheck and attached it.
>>>
>> OK, thanks. What went wrong with the first installation?
>>
>> I notice that this is using TS. Can you try experiment with this machine
>> locally? Or perhaps just try:
>>
>> <http://cygwin.com/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.setup-fails-on-ts>
>>
>>
> I reduced DEP down to just Windows executables and dlls and then rebooted.
>
> And it actually seemed to make the problem worse:
>
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
> bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
> bash-4.1$
>
>
> So DEP in is play here but sort of inverse from what I'd expect. There
> was no switch now to totally disable it. I guess they want you to
> fiddle with the registry to turn it all the way off.
>
>
>
I tried reinstalling bash and coreutils which installed ok but both
their postinstall scripts have an abnormal exit 128 which is exactly
what I was seeing previously.
Regards,
Gerry
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -