X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_WW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-RZG-AUTH:	:Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brksyK8dozXDwHXjf9hj/zDNRbfA44+iwyQ==
X-RZG-CLASS-ID:	mo00
From:	Bruno Haible <bruno AT clisp DOT org>
To:	bug-gnulib AT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 16-bit wchar_t on Windows and Cygwin
Date:	Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:48:48 +0100
User-Agent:	KMail/1.9.9
References:	<201101310304 DOT 42975 DOT bruno AT clisp DOT org> <201102030112 DOT 53179 DOT bruno AT clisp DOT org> <20110203094142 DOT GU2675 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20110203094142.GU2675@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<201102031148.49143.bruno@clisp.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> isn't wwchar_t equivalent to wint_t on all
> platforms?  On UCS-4 platforms sizeof(wint_t) == sizeof(wchar_t) == 4
> because there's no reason to make it bigger.  On UCS-2 and UTF-16
> platforms sizeof(wint_t) == 4 because it must be able to hold EOF as
> well.  So, why not just use the wint_t type for the time being?

The "must be able to hold WEOF as well" argument holds for the argument
type of iswwalpha.  If we were to call it 'wwint_t', it would be the same as
'wint_t', yes. For this reason, we don't need a separate type 'wwint_t'.

But 'wwchar_t' is the base type for wide wide character _arrays_.
Such arrays don't need to hold the WEOF value. On AIX platforms, where
wchar_t[] is the UCS-2 encoding, wwchar_t[] can be synonymous to it.
There is no need to make wwchar_t 32 bits wide on these platforms.

So, my current code looks like this:

# if (defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__) || defined __CYGWIN__
/* Define 'wwchar_t' as a type that
     - can hold 32 bits, unlike wchar_t which can hold only 16 bits,
     - promotes to 'wint_t' under the default argument promotions.  */
typedef wint_t wwchar_t; /* actually 'unsigned int' or 'uint32_t' */
# else
typedef wchar_t wwchar_t;
# endif

Bruno
-- 
In memoriam Buddy Holly <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_Holly>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -