delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
* Jørgen Steensgaard (Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:34:15 +0100) > I want to terminate this discussion, originating from my concern for > consistency among distribution providers. > > Originally I reported on a successful installation of basic Cygwin, i.e. > without X, followed by a failing attempt to install X. Of course I have > been aware all the way that X did not come with the basic installation, > and I have no idea of how to install X on top of it without using > setup.exe by Cygwin. Still I am asked to specify how I obtained the > packages for X, because they are not part of the basic installation. > > I see no reason to spend more time on this, the experience of which is > like being part of an absurd comedy, to say it mildly. I feel confident > that I can overcome the technical issues if I use the time on them instead. You were asked simple and specific questions. You didn't bother to answer these questions. That's not absurd but rather sad. Thorsten -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |