delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BJ,TW_IB,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Yahoo-SMTP: | jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- |
Date: | Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:27:57 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Where to find a reliable provider of CygwinX? |
Message-ID: | <20110201182757.GA3139@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <4D48169F DOT 3030607 AT steensgaard DOT org> <AANLkTi=bgxvGt3PyvxQ_0x5c3DPbogWLZ595z3o_Y5ih AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <ii9c7f$33r$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4D48376C DOT 8070204 AT cygwin DOT com> <ii9ih4$9j9$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <ii9ih4$9j9$1@dough.gmane.org> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:13:51PM +0100, J??rgen Steensgaard wrote: >Thanks for the guidance. But: yes, I refer to a provider on the list of >mirrors found in setup.exe; and yes, I realise the difficulty to ensure >consistency and the urge to put responsibilities on mirror owners. Some >mechanism of mirror authorisation is in my opinion needed. As previously mentioned, we already have that. >Is the original distribution available to common users? Or at least >details of the contents? If not, I have no reference system and cannot >identify derivations? > >Do remember that the impressions left by inconsistencies will stick also >on the original -- which is actually fair. How about if we treat your problem as a support experience rather than a call to redesign all of the mirror handling? You have not provided such basic details as: What, exactly, did you select when installing that would lead you to believe that you should have had X programs installed? What mirror did you use? What error message did you receive when you tried to install xinit but found it unavailable? I have a very hard time believing that you found official cygwin mirrors which did not have the libjpeg62 package but, if you did, we'd certainly like to know which ones are in error. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |