| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EXECUTABLE_URI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BD,TW_BJ,TW_BP,TW_GJ,TW_IB,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| From: | =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgen_Steensgaard?= <jsm AT steensgaard DOT org> |
| Subject: | Re: Where to find a reliable provider of CygwinX? |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:26:19 +0100 |
| Lines: | 101 |
| Message-ID: | <ii9c7f$33r$1@dough.gmane.org> |
| References: | <4D48169F DOT 3030607 AT steensgaard DOT org> <AANLkTi=bgxvGt3PyvxQ_0x5c3DPbogWLZ595z3o_Y5ih AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
| In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTi=bgxvGt3PyvxQ_0x5c3DPbogWLZ595z3o_Y5ih@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Thanks Marco. Below I react in-line to most of your questions. My main=20
point is the lack of distribution consistency I have reported on.
J=F8rgen
On 01/02/2011 16:45, marco atzeri wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:20 PM, J=F8rgen Steensgaard wrote:
>> After having installed a basic version of Cygwin I wanted to install X a=
nd a
>> few programs that depend on it. Using one mirror I thought I was doing
>> well, but no program X were found. Somehow I got the information that x=
init
>> was needed, but that I could not obtain from the mirror. So I found anot=
her
>> and lo-and-behold: I got xinit, X, and Xemacs.
>>
>> From previous experience I knew that the X-server should be started som=
ehow,
>> but I could not resist to call Xemacs right away. And believe it or not=
: it
>> could not start, and complained about a missing cygjpeg-62.dll. So back=
to
>> the provider to have a look for the package libjpeg-62, identified by a
>> lookup elsewhere. But neither of the two providers had such a package, =
but
>> instead some different libjpeg-*. After having downloaded all of these, =
the
>> complaint came back again.
>
> the package is "libjpeg62"
Sorry for the added hypen. I use another computer to send mail for the=20
moment.
> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=3Dlibjpeg62%2Flibjpeg62-6=
b-21&grep=3Dcygjpeg-62.dll
>
> are you sue that xemacs need cygjpeg-62.dll ?
Only to the extent that I can rely on the reaction to my attempt to run=20
xemacs.
>
> on the setup.ini file it is reported libjpeg8
>
> @ emacs-X11
> sdesc: "X11 binaries for Emacs."
> ldesc: "This package contains the X11 binaries for emacs. Install
> it if you want to run emacs using the X window system for
> display. The binaries also can be used in non-X11 mode."
> category: Editors Interpreters
> requires: alternatives emacs font-adobe-dpi75 font-misc-misc libICE6
> libSM6 libX11_6 libXft2 libXpm4 libXrender1 libdbus1_3 libfontconfig1
> libfreetype6 libgcc1 libgdk_pixbuf2.0_0 libgif4 libglib2.0_0
> libgtk2.0_0 libjpeg8 libncursesw10 libpng12 libtiff5 cygwin
> version: 23.2-3
>
> what is the output of "cygcheck emacs-X11.exe" ?
>
1. could not find emacs-X11.exe
2. cygcheck xemacs-21.4.22.exe outputs several lines, one of which
reads:
cygcheck: track_down: could not find cygjpeg-62.dll
>>
>> So: please give me some advice on where to find a provider of all packag=
es
>> and preferably also some about how packages have been tested for
>> completeness.
>
> any mirror should contain all the packages.
I agree that this should be the case, but experience that it is not.=20
The absence of X and xinit from one provider and presence in another is=20
more than annoying.
>
> The problem you see is more likely due to the fact that libjpeg62 is
> an obsolete package,
> So to see it on the "select packages" window list you need to unset
> "hide obsolete packages" in the left down corner of the window .
Thank you for a hint to work around this particular situation. My main=20
objective is to discuss distribution consistency.
>
>>
>> Sincerely
>>
>> J=F8rgen Steensgaard
>>
>
> Regards
> Marco
>
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |