X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_DZ
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk
Message-ID:	<4D46FBDD.9010304@cygwin.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:13:49 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Issue with socket SO_REUSEADDR when a client is connected.
References:	<AANLkTi=HunjC3MPZo37xZ8Yd1Mh1329yD5sQDfaNJWG9 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20110130221219 DOT GH1057 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTinQaRH98zR_TkrcBhgP2qU+RL9vkzMyg89rhXXv AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTinQaRH98zR_TkrcBhgP2qU+RL9vkzMyg89rhXXv@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 1/31/2011 11:12 AM, jdzstz - gmail dot com wrote:
>>
>> The Cygwin workaround to fix the WinSock SO_REUSEADDR behaviour from
>> back in 2006 was not so nifty after all.  I just fixed that in CVS.  I'm
>> going to generate a new developer snapshot right now.  Should be up in a
>> couple of minutes.
>>
>
> Using cygwin snapshot, the testcase and varnishtest program works fine.
>
> This bugfix will be included in cygwin 1.7.8 ?

Snapshots are the basis for the coming release so yes.

> There is any estimated release date for cygwin 1.7.8?

Yes.

...Oh, you wanted to know what that estimate is? ;-)  Currently the thought is
sometime in early February.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -