delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Jan 29 19:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 29 10:21, Eric Blake wrote: > > In other words, cygwin IS being POSIX-compliant by advertising only the > > Unicode 4.0 character set in the __STDC_ISO_10646__, while still Btw., you are aware that Unicode 4.0 already defines more characters than fit into the base plane, aren't you? I chose the value in an attempt to be carefully conservative. I'm not 100% sure if that's the right thing to do... > > supporting Unicode 5.2 (should we upgrade to Unicode 6.0?) as an Yeah, how could we live without emoticons all the time ;-) But, sure, it would be nice to get contributions to to support 6.0 in the wctype functions. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |