delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/01/29/13:28:38

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:28:18 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-gnu-libiconv AT gnu DOT org
Subject: Re: Bug in libiconv?
Message-ID: <20110129182818.GD1057@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-gnu-libiconv AT gnu DOT org
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-gnu-libiconv AT gnu DOT org
References: <201101282312 DOT 50298 DOT bruno AT clisp DOT org> <20110129123014 DOT GA8671 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4D442DDA DOT 4050807 AT redhat DOT com> <20110129160157 DOT GA1057 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4D444CAC DOT 2010300 AT redhat DOT com> <20110129181231 DOT GC1057 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110129181231.GC1057@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jan 29 19:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 29 10:21, Eric Blake wrote:
> > In other words, cygwin IS being POSIX-compliant by advertising only the
> > Unicode 4.0 character set in the __STDC_ISO_10646__, while still

Btw., you are aware that Unicode 4.0 already defines more characters than
fit into the base plane, aren't you?

I chose the value in an attempt to be carefully conservative.  I'm not
100% sure if that's the right thing to do...

> > supporting Unicode 5.2 (should we upgrade to Unicode 6.0?) as an

Yeah, how could we live without emoticons all the time ;-)

But, sure, it would be nice to get contributions to to support 6.0
in the wctype functions.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019