Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/01/19/11:00:39
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:45:02PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>> * David Antliff (Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:27:36 +1300)
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 21:30, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>>> > I don't think anyone will do that unless you provide the logs in native
>>> > (PML) format.
>>>
>>> Ok, I can do that - I posted them as CSV as I thought they'd be easier
>>> to read/diff and I wasn't sure if I should attach a file here.
>>
>> The amount of data in a PM log is much easier to handle via PM itself
>> (although it doesn't do diffs).
>>
>>> So should I attach them to my response or host them elsewhere and link
>>> to them? Are on-list attachments acceptable?
>>
>> Attachments are okay in general (see http://cygwin.com/problems.html).
>> Despite the "do not compress" recommendation, I think compression would
>> be advisible since PM log files tend to be huge.
>>
>> Thorsten
>>
>
>long attachment are rejected by the mailing list.
Actually long email messages are rejected. It has nothing to do with attachments.
But, please don't send long log files here if they are just for one person to
inspect. Use private email for that.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -