X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:13:18 +0100
Message-ID:	<AANLkTimioT4OZ7CfW1Kh7R1nWv7uKz6v_3w=Hcgv-J6D@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Adding madvise function in cygwin with a #define
From:	jdzstz - gmail dot com <jdzstz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Testing a linux application that uses "madvise", varnish cache, I have
realized that in cygwin doesnot exists this function but exists the
alternative "posix_madvise".

Adding inside configure.ac script:
+		AC_DEFINE([madvise], [posix_madvise], [In CYGWIN, madvise function
is not defined, instead we use posix_madvise])
+		AC_DEFINE([MADV_RANDOM], [POSIX_MADV_RANDOM], [In CYGWIN,
MADV_RANDOM define is not defined, instead we use POSIX_MADV_RANDOM])

allows compiling successfuly the aplication, without any other source changes.

I think it could be interesting adding this defines to cygwin headers,
at the end of <sys/mman.h> file

#define madvise posix_madvise
#define MADV_NORMAL POSIX_MADV_NORMAL
#define MADV_SEQUENTIAL POSIX_MADV_SEQUENTIAL
#define MADV_RANDOM POSIX_MADV_RANDOM
#define MADV_WILLNEED POSIX_MADV_WILLNEED
#define MADV_DONTNEED POSIX_MADV_DONTNEED

This allows us to make less changes when compiling linux applications.
I have seen that correct POSIX function is "posix_madvise" and
"madvise" is defined in some systems: Linux and FreeBSD but seems
people in this systems prefer use it instead posix_* alternative.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -