X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:54:35 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Strange fstatat / stat behavour on directories causing tar "file changed as we read it" error
Message-ID:	<20110111095435.GF3413@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3501944D149644D394474781054F5E98 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <4D2783A3 DOT 5000008 AT redhat DOT com> <D43AAA42D53E47AF958054385DAEFB50 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <4D27C896 DOT 30202 AT cygwin DOT com> <265F601A437E4A03BE8C665BE7470721 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <4D27D66F DOT 8030201 AT cygwin DOT com> <4D28F1AC DOT 1070907 AT laposte DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4D28F1AC.1070907@laposte.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jan  9 00:22, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> 
> Le 08/01/2011 04:13, Larry Hall (Cygwin) a écrit :
> > 
> > On 1/7/2011 9:39 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> >> Here it takes about 2 - 5mins for what ever is causing the 0 size after a
> >> find to start to happen. Prior to that after the find all dirs show
> >> 8192 for
> >> size in an ls.
> > 
> > Ah, that's interesting.  I see no such time-lag here.
> > 
> <snip>
<snip, too>
> IMHO, the first time the directory size is read, the size used by
> FindFirstFile/FindNextFile (or something like that :-) is zero'ed,
> then the directory size is updated while the directory is traversed.
> also the directory size doesn't seem to shrink on entry removal,
> even after a reboot.

I can not reproduce the effect, at least not on W7, but apparently it
happens on some systems.  So, given that the directory size is
irrelevant for all practical purposes anyway, and given that there's no
application which has problems with a directory size of 0, should Cygwin
just always set st_size to 0 for directories?  Independent of the
underlying FS?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -