delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SARE_FREE_WEBM_LAPOSTE,TW_RW,TW_WX,TW_XR,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4D28F1AC.1070907@laposte.net> |
Date: | Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:22:20 +0100 |
From: | Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille DOT lefevre-lists AT laposte DOT net> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Strange fstatat / stat behavour on directories causing tar "file changed as we read it" error |
References: | <3501944D149644D394474781054F5E98 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <4D2783A3 DOT 5000008 AT redhat DOT com> <D43AAA42D53E47AF958054385DAEFB50 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <4D27C896 DOT 30202 AT cygwin DOT com> <265F601A437E4A03BE8C665BE7470721 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <4D27D66F DOT 8030201 AT cygwin DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <4D27D66F.8030201@cygwin.com> |
X-me-spamlevel: | not-spam |
X-me-spamrating: | 36.000000 |
X-me-spamcause: | OK, (-100)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfedutddrtdegucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuoehnohhnvgeqnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecuucdlqddutddtmd |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Le 08/01/2011 04:13, Larry Hall (Cygwin) a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > On 1/7/2011 9:39 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: >=20 > <snip> >=20 >> Here it takes about 2 - 5mins for what ever is causing the 0 size after a >> find to start to happen. Prior to that after the find all dirs show >> 8192 for >> size in an ls. >=20 > Ah, that's interesting. I see no such time-lag here. >=20 <snip> it seems to depend on the number of the entries the directory has. Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs v2$ ls -ld drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 0 Feb 15 2007 . Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs v2$ ll total 128 drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 8192 Sep 10 20:00 CVSROOT drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 4096 Jun 18 2010 exploitation drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 0 Oct 12 2006 test Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs v2$ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0; do for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0; do echo $i$j; done; done | xargs mkdir Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs v2$ ls -ld drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 16384 Jan 8 15:02 . Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs v2$ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0; do for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0; do echo $i$j; done; done | xargs rmdir Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs v2$ ls -ld drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 16384 Jan 8 15:03 . reboot Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs $ ls -ld drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 0 Jan 8 15:03 . Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs $ find . > /dev/null Cyrille AT nowhere ~/somewhere/cvs $ ls -ld drwxrwsr-x+ 1 Cyrille None 16384 Jan 8 15:03 . IMHO, the first time the directory size is read, the size used by FindFirstFile/FindNextFile (or something like that :-) is zero'ed, then the directory size is updated while the directory is traversed. also the directory size doesn't seem to shrink on entry removal, even after a reboot. Regards, Cyrille Lefevre --=20 mailto:Cyrille DOT Lefevre-lists AT laposte DOT net -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |