X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4D27AEF0.2000102@users.sourceforge.net>
References:	<AANLkTik2mdQs8PV-28s2Y2gFO9aW=RdO=+n4kaQBWHJ2 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4D27AEF0 DOT 2000102 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2011 18:10:19 -0800
Message-ID:	<AANLkTi=S5NBOia=evytYKcTXP748dAUGN=zjADMjtust@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Bad rebaseall interaction with new mingw
From:	Daniel Colascione <dan DOT colascione AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, JonY <jon_y AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> wrote:
> IMHO rebaseall shouldn't be interacting with mingw dlls at all. Maybe it
> can check for dependencies on cygwin1.dll before rebasing?

That's the point. The mingw DLLs need to be added to rebaseall's filter pattern.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -