X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:20:55 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: NetAPP / cygwin 1.7.7-1 avoid Recycle BIN dot files
Message-ID:	<20101122142055.GU18309@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20101117153803 DOT GB11144 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1PIkw2-1epSuu0 AT fwd05 DOT aul DOT t-online DOT de> <20101117174620 DOT GD11144 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20101117174620.GD11144@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Nov 17 18:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 17 17:32, koerner.sebastian wrote:
> > Hello Corinna,
> >  
> >  Oh, btw.  In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
> >  returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
> >  filesystem.  The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
> >  
> >  Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest
> >  Cygwin 1.7.7 or the latest snapshot returns "vfat" and are they *really*
> >  netapps?  In theory I'd expect that those are just remote FAT FS on some
> >  remote Windows machine, and they shouldn't be affected by the reported
> >  problem.
> >  
> > 
> > I just checked and think I must have something mixed up.
> > Under 1.7.7-1 both netapps are listed in "mount" as cifs and in getVolInfo as FAT with pretty much the same attribute set.
> 
> Pretty much is not the same.  Can you please send the getVolInfo output
> for the other drive, too?

And, can you please check the next developer snapshot from
http://cygwin.com/snapshots and see if it fixes your problem?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -