delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/11/17/11:32:55

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20101117153803.GB11144@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <20101117153803 DOT GB11144 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:32:37 +0100
Reply-To: "koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de" <koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: NetAPP / cygwin 1.7.7-1 avoid Recycle BIN dot files
From: "koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de" <koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de>
Message-ID: <1PIkw2-1epSuu0@fwd05.aul.t-online.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello Corinna,
 
 Oh, btw.  In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
 returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
 filesystem.  The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
 
 Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest
 Cygwin 1.7.7 or the latest snapshot returns "vfat" and are they *really*
 netapps?  In theory I'd expect that those are just remote FAT FS on some
 remote Windows machine, and they shouldn't be affected by the reported
 problem.
 

I just checked and think I must have something mixed up.
Under 1.7.7-1 both netapps are listed in "mount" as cifs and in getVolInfo as FAT with pretty much the same attribute set.

If wonder: If this really is a netapp Bug - are you in contact with them?

Best regards
Sebastian 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ohne Brief, aber mit Siegel. Mit Telekom De-Mail vertraulich und rechtsverbindlich online kommunizieren. Jetzt registrieren! www.telekom.de/de-mail



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019