delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20101117153803.GB11144@calimero.vinschen.de> |
References: | <20101117153803 DOT GB11144 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:32:37 +0100 |
Reply-To: | "koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de" <koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: NetAPP / cygwin 1.7.7-1 avoid Recycle BIN dot files |
From: | "koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de" <koerner DOT sebastian AT t-online DOT de> |
Message-ID: | <1PIkw2-1epSuu0@fwd05.aul.t-online.de> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Hello Corinna, Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as filesystem. The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type. Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest Cygwin 1.7.7 or the latest snapshot returns "vfat" and are they *really* netapps? In theory I'd expect that those are just remote FAT FS on some remote Windows machine, and they shouldn't be affected by the reported problem. I just checked and think I must have something mixed up. Under 1.7.7-1 both netapps are listed in "mount" as cifs and in getVolInfo as FAT with pretty much the same attribute set. If wonder: If this really is a netapp Bug - are you in contact with them? Best regards Sebastian ---------------------------------------------------------------- Ohne Brief, aber mit Siegel. Mit Telekom De-Mail vertraulich und rechtsverbindlich online kommunizieren. Jetzt registrieren! www.telekom.de/de-mail -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |