X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk
Message-ID:	<4CDA0A13.4050702@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:57:23 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Syntax highlighting not working in vim73
References:	<0C33B811BB93B3469F549ADBFA84414718BC77B2E8 AT NALASEXMB08 DOT na DOT qualcomm DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<0C33B811BB93B3469F549ADBFA84414718BC77B2E8@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 11/9/2010 7:14 PM, Harrington, John wrote:
> Thank you very much, Larry.  This worked, though perhaps not for the reason
> you expected.  Excuse the long description that follows, but the fix raised
> some issues that I thought I should report.

.
.
.

> 7.3.3 is the one I thought I installed.  I don't recall installing a separate
> utility "vim 7.1", but I guess I must have.  In any case, I'm very satisfied
> that "vi" is now showing syntax.  It puzzles me a bit that the specific
> command "vim" still does not work with syntax, but since I never type "vim"
> (I could easily reverse the above alias, I suppose), I am not concerned.

This is indeed wrong.  All your vim-related executables should be symbolic
links to more links under '/etc/alternatives'.  See
"/etc/postinstall/vim.sh.*" for details of what should be linked where.
Your '/usr/bin/vim' is apparently the actual executable from a previous
version (7.1).  If nothing else, I'd recommend you remove '/usr/bin/vim.exe'
to avoid future confusion/problems.

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -