X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:19:17 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin paths in mingw64
Message-ID:	<20101105141917.GC22365@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<30139174 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <285084 DOT 61145 DOT qm AT web25502 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <AANLkTinqk-wTz=Lj-kWz_udC0ueLeVGVhqUns2-UveJJ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTinqk-wTz=Lj-kWz_udC0ueLeVGVhqUns2-UveJJ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:31:15PM +0000, NightStrike wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri AT yahoo DOT it> wrote:
>> and Atlas is so deep unix related, that is better to use
>
>Does this imply that a direct mingw port is not feasible without
>extensive effort?

Can we terminate this discussion now?  It hasn't really been on-topic
for some time and speculation about whether a mingw port is feasible is
really not fodder for this mailing list.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -