X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk
Message-ID:	<4CD178DE.7010308@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:59:42 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is part of gcc3 missing?
References:	<21794C64742846718853014B087D0E6F AT cit DOT wayne DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<21794C64742846718853014B087D0E6F@cit.wayne.edu>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 11/3/2010 10:10 AM, Lee Maschmeyer wrote:
> Hmm. Is that really the best approach unless absolutely necessary? "That
> doesn't work so do something else" has always struck me as a less than ideal
> approach to debugging. :-) Is it possible that caml could be repaired so it
> doesn't depend on GCC4?

I'm not sure "repaired" is the right word for this but I expect it would be
possible to do this.  I'm not sure anyone would consider it worth the time
though.  Presumably, some older release of ocaml would build with gcc-3,
though I think you're heading in the wrong direction if you have as a goal
to avoid build problems in the future.  But if you are intent on going this
route, you might find downgrading your ocaml packages to 3.08 will help
side-step the issue.  Given it's age, I would be surprised if it were built
with gcc-4, though I didn't actually check that.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -