X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_NEUTRAL,TW_FN,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4CCDBF2D.3080707@cornell.edu>
Date:	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:10:37 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: R: Emacs silence
References:	<646878 DOT 80724 DOT qm AT web25502 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <4CCD584A DOT 8060806 AT cornell DOT edu> <4CCDAB66 DOT 50603 AT aber DOT ac DOT uk>
In-Reply-To:	<4CCDAB66.50603@aber.ac.uk>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 10/31/2010 1:46 PM, Nigel Hardy wrote:
> Thank you Eliot for the mail attachment suggestion. I attach the output
> here.
> Thank you Ken for the "cygcheck /usr/bin/emacs-X11.exe" suggestion - the
> output seems good to me and is attached. Starting from mintty did not work.
>
>      bash-3.2$ echo $DISPLAY
>      127.0.0.1:0.0
>      bash-3.2$ emacs
>      bash-3.2$ emacs-X11.exe
>      bash-3.2$ cygcheck -s -v -r>  cygcheck.out
>      bash-3.2$ cygcheck /usr/bin/emacs-X11.exe>  cygcheck_emacs.out
>
> I have also tried running the Xming server in place of Cygwin/X. This
> displays "xterm" ok. but emacs-X11.exe fails silently in the same way.

[Please don't top-post.]

Your output from cygcheck /usr/bin/emacs-X11.exe is different from mine. 
  I get C:\cygwin\bin\cyggthread-2.0-0.dll right below 
C:\cygwin\bin\cyggobject-2.0-0.dll.  Did you by any chance edit the 
output and accidentally delete that line?  Otherwise, I don't understand 
why there's a difference.

Also, your cygcheck.out shows that you still have some remnants of an 
obsolete X server on your system.  For example, you have /usr/X11R6/bin 
in your path, and you have the following obsolete packages installed:

xorg-x11-base                   7.4-1
xorg-x11-bin                    7.4-1
xorg-x11-bin-dlls               7.4-1
xorg-x11-bin-lndir              7.4-1
xorg-x11-etc                    7.4-1
xorg-x11-fenc                   7.4-1
xorg-x11-fnts                   7.4-1
xorg-x11-libs-data              7.4-1
xorg-x11-xwin                   7.4-1

I don't know whether that's your problem or not, but you should 
uninstall them and get rid of /usr/X11R6/bin.  Also, you haven't said 
how you're starting the X server.  Are you by any chance using the 
obsolete startxwin.bat?

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -