delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TW_LG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:58:33 +0200 |
From: | Samuel Thibault <samuel DOT thibault AT ens-lyon DOT org> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: -static not working with gcc 4.3.4 |
Message-ID: | <20101018125833.GB25504@const> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <20101017005857 DOT GA28900 AT const DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F201762C09 AT A1DAL1SWPES19MB DOT ams DOT acs-inc DOT net> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F201762C09@A1DAL1SWPES19MB.ams.acs-inc.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Nellis, Kenneth, le Mon 18 Oct 2010 07:45:15 -0500, a écrit : > > From: Samuel Thibault > > $ cat test.c > > int main(void) {} > > $ gcc test.c -o test -static > > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: > > cannot find -lgcc_s > > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: > > cannot find -lgcc_s > > > > There indeed is libgcc_s.dll.a in /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/, but for > > some reason gcc doesn't seem to be happy with it. This is using gcc4 > > and > > gcc4-core 4.3.4-3. gcc-3 works fine. > > Please, why such a large test case when the following would > have been perfectly adequate to demonstrate the problem?: > > $ cat test.c > main() {} > $ Because providing precise information is always better when reporting a bug, whatever the circumstances. That being said, I'd still like to see this bug fixed: the -static is suppoed to be able to work alone. Samuel -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |