X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-50.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Subject:	Re: ocaml: patches needed
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<3F718711-595B-44C5-B2A8-61CF29BA00A4@inria.fr>
References:	<1439640916 DOT 139526 DOT 1286812910597 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT zmbs1 DOT inria DOT fr> <3F718711-595B-44C5-B2A8-61CF29BA00A4 AT inria DOT fr>
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:51 -0500
Message-ID:	<1286982891.2656.2.camel@YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:47 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to have something named "ocaml" that doesn't
> implement the full upstream package.  What I will do instead is:
> 
> ocaml-base   for the system except camlp4
> ocaml-camlp4 for camlp4
> ocaml        an empty helper package that depends on ocaml-base and ocaml-camlp4
> 
> I'm not sure what to name the base package: it could be ocaml-base or
> ocaml-core.  Is there a generally-accepted naming convention for such
> cases?

No, but Debian uses ocaml-base, so I'd suggest that.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -