X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_PH
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4CB20B3C.1070803@bopp.net>
Date:	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:51:40 -0500
From:	Jeremy Bopp <jeremy AT bopp DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Build Graphviz
References:	<AANLkTin4wo=MGvKM1heQrAQ1ZRw6B7RmkR=iXCoeYAyE AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4CB1DD80 DOT 5030909 AT bopp DOT net> <1286732378 DOT 3004 DOT 1 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
In-Reply-To:	<1286732378.3004.1.camel@YAAKOV04>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 10/10/2010 12:39 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 10:36 -0500, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>> On 10/10/2010 10:24 AM, Steven Woody wrote:
>>> Who succeeded in building Graphviz for cygwin?
>>
>> Cygwin Ports has support to build version 2.26.3 from the look of things:
>>
>> http://cygwin-ports.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cygwin-ports/ports/trunk/graphics/graphviz/
> 
> FYI, Ports SVN is obsolete; I'm now using Git:
> 
> http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ports;a=tree;f=graphics/graphviz

I thought I remembered you mentioning something to that effect sometime
in the past, but I didn't see anything about it at:

http://sourceware.org/cygwinports/

Is that no longer the right place to look?

> YA package I should probably ITP...

I would love it if that package made it into Cygwin proper because we
use graphviz for a few things where I work.  Right now, we have to use
the Windows native build and its installer because it's easier than
trying to get everyone using Cygwin Ports for just that one tool.  Of
course, we would also be satisfied if it was easier to use the Cygwin
Ports repository with Cygwin's setup.exe.

I'm well aware of the time limitations for any of this though, so I'm
certainly not demanding anything. ;-)

-Jeremy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -