delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/10/07/18:32:49

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:32:28 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Looking for experienced CygWin Users
Message-ID: <20101007223215.GH24824@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <29894398 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <376593050 DOT 20101006200403 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <AANLkTikBi-G5wmNq=P8KG8HJ8hyxhwL_k5kv0M2Ykhsi AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <19630 DOT 18156 DOT 687137 DOT 601607 AT yeti DOT mininet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19630.18156.687137.601607@yeti.mininet>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:17:16AM +0200, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
>just my 2 pence

And here's mine:

It just occurred to me that we already have something like this with the
Cygwin irc channel at freenode.  It's populated mainly by cygwin novices
who either just plaintively send out queries, wait a couple of minutes,
and log off or who offer well-meaning advice like "Just reinstall it.
That will fix it."

(Ok, a few cygwin-knowledgeable people hang out there too, but still...)

I do split me time by offering a very limited amount of support on that
channel but a lot of my responses suggest sending email to the cygwin
mailing list.  I do that because I don't particularly want to figure out
what's wrong with an obscure cygwin package when the OP could (in theory
at least) commuicate with the cygwin package maintainer directly.

I would expect an unofficial "newbie" support channel could be a pretty
frustrating place to be since it would probably be similarly "staffed"
with people who have only barely figured out how things work and who
could be offering marginal advice.  Then, when things don't work out, a
"newbie" will be forced to come to the official support channel where,
it is possible, we'll have to undo damage inflicted by well-meaning
advice.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019