X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-50.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Subject:	Re: trouble posting to cygwin-apps
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4CABA2F9.6090906@kitware.com>
References:	<4CAA3A16 DOT 1000103 AT kitware DOT com> <4CAB8EA9 DOT 8020104 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4CAB98BF DOT 8050006 AT kitware DOT com> <1286315505 DOT 8828 DOT 334 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <4CABA2F9 DOT 6090906 AT kitware DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:20:54 -0500
Message-ID:	<1286432454.5420.49.camel@YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 18:13 -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Really this belongs on the CMake dev list.

In so much as this affects a Cygwin packages, it is perfectly on topic
here.

> The new release I just posted is not really a new release of CMake, but 
> it is a new release for cygwin.  The current cmake that comes with 
> cygwin is 2.6.4 (very old).  The one I just uploaded was 2.8.2 (still 
> old but much newer.)  It has no changes at all.

How exactly is 2.8.2 old when it is the latest official release?

> We are currently working on 2.8.3, it has some of the patches you want, 
> but not all.  However, please work with me on the cmake dev list to come 
> up with a solution that won't break all of the projects I support (VTK, 
> ITK, and several others).

That may be the long term solution, but right now we need a working
cmake, and your 2.8.2-1 isn't it.  You want WIN32 defined on Cygwin, but
*we* do not.  As so far as the Cygwin distribution is concerned,
shouldn't the views of those who make the distribution take priority?

> I do not want to create a cygwin release that does not match the 
> upstream CMake.

Unfortunately we need you to do exactly that until upstream has been
fixed.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -