delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/09/30/15:13:20

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4CA2FDAD.8040100@ltu.se>
References: <4CA1C204 DOT 6090405 AT epfl DOT ch> <4CA1C3EE DOT 1030204 AT ece DOT cmu DOT edu> <AANLkTinm7jU3yC7FM+bQyp6FzwYoYb+M8L524bzFXGu=@mail.gmail.com> <4CA1EFC6 DOT 6030202 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <AANLkTi=ukyqD=NRR=-eTX_vojsKbOVtenc0Ksv3fKfKr AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4CA2FDAD DOT 8040100 AT ltu DOT se>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:12:39 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTino2b=+RS1OWr05ZcPvbQeZpyybjCQ=cWygr_r2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: mintty window won't open
From: Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 29 September 2010 09:49, Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote:
>>> I think you can detect this situation (no access to the interactive
>>> desktop
>>> or whatever is it called), if you wished to issue a suitable error
>>> message,
>>> by checking that OpenInputDesktop() returns non-NULL...
>>
>> Good idea, and that does seem to do the job.
>>
>> Opening a window in that situation seems to work fine anyway though. I
>> guess it goes to some hidden desktop. Can anyone think of a sensible
>> use case for that, i.e. should I make this a warning rather than an
>> error?
>>
> I have a feeling it could be useful someway. Why not a command switch:
> --allow_null_desktop or something?

Because there's a good chance that no-one would ever need it. ;)

I'll make this a warning (or possibly just leave it).

Andy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019