delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4CA00F16.6030407@charter.net> |
References: | <4C9EA18E DOT 4060903 AT charter DOT net> <4C9FF0FF DOT 3080506 AT cygwin DOT com> <4CA00F16 DOT 6030407 AT charter DOT net> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:46:37 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <AANLkTinoh_7F0rTPMDPVBUkL=op4RhOpcBQXCsnMpmsP@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: My bash shell suddenly has "X-ray vision" |
From: | Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 27 September 2010 04:27, SJ Wright wrote: >>> Or is it just the difference in encodings? >>> >>> In scripts and config/convenience files like .bashrc or .bash_aliases, = it >>> can >>> =C2=A0see *through* "crunches" (#), which are supposed to make a line o= f text >>> invisible to a shell <or am I wrong on that?> >>> >>> Could it be because I added a LANG variable and have been turning out >>> not-quite-UTF-8 stuff from my one or two text editors? The only guess I >>> can >>> make with my limited knowledge is that, once UTF8 is set or enabled, >>> ISO-8859-1 "crunches," for all practical purposes, are meaningless to t= he >>> shell. To answer that part: no, UTF-8 vs ISO-8859-1 makes no difference to that symbol, because it's part of the ASCII range, which is shared between all of the character encodings supported by Cygwin. > the mouseless approach vi and nano restrict one to. They do you have some mouse support actually. Enable with ':set mouse=3Da' in vim, and with Alt+m in nano. > ~/.Xresources: Little-endian UTF-16 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminat= ors That one won't work, because UTF-16 is not ASCII-compatible. Andy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |