delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTim+hU+Cg6_J83B_h9VHsL8wiC4Xh7TbcwzjSjkW@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <AANLkTim+hU+Cg6_J83B_h9VHsL8wiC4Xh7TbcwzjSjkW AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
Date: | Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:45:32 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <AANLkTi=zdhNEQvpECLAgMB-pkg6LUOz+8j7SA4dsK-OO@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin instabilities |
From: | Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
2010/9/13 Al wanted stability stories: > I run Cygwin on a double core machine with Vista. I estimate that 1 of > 20 of my compilations break and need to be repeated. One weak point is > the compression of man pages. I routinely run my perl compiler smokes on cygwin and linux machines. This involves automatic updates, failures which cause core dumps, 100%CPU or eating all available memory. cygwin (better Windows) is more stable than linux in this regard. I should really tune my ulimits on my linux but out of the box my linux box becomes unusable at certain tests. With cygwin not. Cygwin is just about 3x slower, and processes keep locking certain files. Why not. > Others report that they don't use Cygwin because of instablilities, > especially in the server context. Okay. While I'm running my nightly destructive smokes I also serve content for various projects. My linux laptop started with issues (heat or SW?) during night while people were up- and downloading via sftp, so I fell back to my cygwin box, and since then I kept running this cygwin server instead. Much more stable than my linux box so far. Of course that's most likely a HW issue, but cygwin was stable enough and better. For example I run vlc sessions (publicly broadcasting football games from brazil here in my town) with the cygwin perl testing sessions and cygwin stfp uploading in the background, and linux is not really as fast and stable in vlc client response as I with my windows box. > What are the reasons? Will this be better with Windows 7? Can Cygwin > become "server stable"? Windows 7 was not better for me. More system DLL's and footprint, much more rebase problems. Sometimes I can only stop MSIE and MS Outlook to continue to work in my mintty shells. "Server stable" in ISP terms of course not. It's still just Windows, with all its known weaknesses. But ISP's are still selling and using windows servers. --=20 Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 http://murbreak.at/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |