X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4C93B9B9.9000509@acm.org>
Date:	Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:55:53 -0700
From:	David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: distro "apache2" will not start
References:	<4C92B2EF DOT 9060002 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <20100917073705 DOT GH15121 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C937E7F DOT 40009 AT acm DOT org> <20100917150210 DOT GB14602 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C9384D0 DOT 2060601 AT acm DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<4C9384D0.2060601@acm.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 9/17/2010 8:10 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 9/17/2010 8:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Sep 17 07:43, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> On 9/17/2010 12:37 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> The apache2 package is orphaned for this long period of time already.
>>>> Maybe it's time to pull it from the distro, unless somebody would
>>>> like to take over maintainership.
>>>
>>> apache2 is a build dependency for subversion, so if you remove it from
>>> the distro, I will need to package a copy of the sources with the
>>> subversion sources and modify my cygport to build it as well as
>>> subversion. I prefer not to do that.
>>
>> Isn't there some kind of apache2 lib which can be handled as a 
>> separate package?  If so, and if you would provide only libapache,
>> we're off the hook.  No bit-rotten apache2 package, and no unjust
>> maintainance burden for you.
> 
> Well, I need apache2-devel. That has a dependency on apache2, but I'm
> not really sure how much of that I need to *build* subversion.
> 
> The test suite for subversion does actually start apache2 in order to
> test the subversion module, but if the distro doesn't provide apache2, I
> suppose I can try to avoid building the module and running those tests.
> That might remove the dependency on apache2, too. I'll investigate.

apache2-devel is not needed by subversion if I don't build the apache2
module. I do need to install a native apache2 instance with subversion
support in order to test the http support in the client, but I suppose I
can do that.

Okay by me to remove apache2 from the distro. I'll try to spin a new
subversion release soon without subversion-apache2. I need to get the
native apache2/svn server running first.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

"If you own a machine, you are in turn owned by it, and spend your time
 serving it..."
                -- Marion Zimmer Bradley, _The Forbidden Tower_

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -