X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=1.0 c=1 a=QQFYH0jDLwUA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9k2X7ZuL2x1Jt9D6e1EA:9 a=TwguRFkQpnFOhhTCXkgA:7 a=3bDzp9sAh_a-H1LFQ-gltzf6zqcA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
Message-ID:	<4C8FDE12.8010903@charter.net>
Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:41:54 -0400
From:	SJ Wright <sjwright68 AT charter DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Reinstalled gcc, make, automake: now BASH stackdumps L&R
References:	<4C8FC348 DOT 8050405 AT charter DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<4C8FC348.8050405@charter.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

SJ Wright wrote:
> Might there be something else a little off?
>
> The text from the latest stackdump:
>> Stack trace:
>> Frame     Function  Args
> The rest is blank. Should I be concerned, or is this something that 
> will work itself out?
>
> Steve W.
>
A little more information that seems pertinent to this issue. These 
stackdumps are created whenever a shell is called on (as with the batch 
scripts that start up my RXVT) or when a subshell (#!/bin/bash) or a 
command (command sequence?) from same is invoked in a script. I've not 
seen them happen under any other circumstances since the reinstalls 
mentioned in the Subject line of my original post. This is annoying, as 
I have quite a few scripts I use both in Cygwin and in Ubuntu GNOME, and 
anyone can guess the hassle of having to adapt for one versus the other 
(taking out the crunch-bang line, specifically, or remembering to add it 
back).

Running various options in cygcheck has so far given me the strong 
impression there's nothing wrong. Should I  run 'rebaseall' to see if 
I'm missing anything that vaguely or remotely supports bash.exe?

SJ Wright


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -