delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_YW |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Yahoo-SMTP: | Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk |
Message-ID: | <4C86867D.4050509@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:37:49 -0400 |
From: | "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: incredibly slow file listing script on windoze 7 pro 4 core 64 bit |
References: | <AANLkTi=ASzGNwU9TSKU2TZSbAksy6=Pu94=0S5Vt0Sc- AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTi=ASzGNwU9TSKU2TZSbAksy6=Pu94=0S5Vt0Sc-@mail.gmail.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 9/7/2010 12:05 PM, mike marchywka wrote: > this takes a few minutes on old debian machine, taking much longer > here on same data- > about 19k file about 24Gb total size. > Windoze finally has better perf stuff but still no help- one core at > 25 pct all kernel > time disk not exactly busy. All the time is in the "ls" loop not the > find command. > Now obbviously I expect the "ls" per file has to make a bunch of OS calls for > each file but still even with cygwin layer seems a bit much. > Thanks. The problem is that Cygwin has to open all the files to stat when you use the '-l' flag. Try without the flag to get the lower bound and see if that's better for you. If so, maybe '-s' will suit your purpose. Or even 'du'? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |