X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4C803739.70105@gmail.com>
References:	<AANLkTimu3V+KSg-8rn-DadFFT_72mO7hGx3oYTOhRd5H AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4C7FFE28 DOT 1010808 AT redhat DOT com> <AANLkTinFK-0nXzvbnJkwc8GxZ-jcp9VeEFhgrA5hU53q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4C8007CA DOT 1050109 AT redhat DOT com> <AANLkTimts9DqiVoFXyxaYeq_YAD7oQ4=eaQ+3r-qut6h AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4C803739 DOT 70105 AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:18:22 +0200
Message-ID:	<AANLkTimmTDRjScRh5HnawyoEenSYNefaX5CprREuzO01@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: .exe magic in Cygwin
From:	Al <oss DOT elmar AT googlemail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

>> Right. I applied it the traditional way.
>
> =A0Ah, you have to understand this about cygport patches: they only conta=
in
> patches for the source files, not the autogenerated ones. =A0So they have
> patches for e.g. Makefile.am, configure.ac; but not for configure or even
> Makefile.in. =A0It's vitally necessary to autoreconf after applying a pat=
ch that
> you get from a cygport-based package.
>

OK, that's it.


>> As a want to come a hybrid of Cygwin and Gentoos Emerge installer, I
>> rather have to figure out one of those hidden ways.
>
> =A0Well, if you're doing it in a POSIX-compatible environment, you should=
 be
> able to run cygport - with maybe a few minor bugs cropping up, but basica=
lly
> it's just a bunch of shell scripts that invoke the autotools, gcc and
> binutils, so they should be relatively easy to port to any similar enviro=
nment.
>
> =A0I did once try running cygport on a linux box (with a cross-compiler).=
 =A0I
> don't remember exactly what went wrong, it didn't work directly out of the
> box, but it shouldn't be hard to fix.
>

This sounds like a real alternative. Very interesting!

It would definitly be worth it's own project group. Then it would be a choi=
ce.

Al

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -