X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<COL102-W8E7E44971FD25E224592BB5860@phx.gbl>
From:	Karl M <karlm30 AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: How/Where do I get an older version of Cygwin?
Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:36:12 -0700
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTinNwrKq-vNr7ze1xvXGq-=sRjpTk4=pWd5VMGPf@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<4C76BA95 DOT 3070201 AT coastside DOT net> <4C76BF63 DOT 9000109 AT cygwin DOT com>,<AANLkTinNwrKq-vNr7ze1xvXGq-=sRjpTk4=pWd5VMGPf AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:08:58 +0100
> Subject: Re: How/Where do I get an older version of Cygwin?
> From: andy
> To: cygwin
>
> I'd recommend against using the "Prev" button. It gives you a rather
> random collection of old packages, where some are years older than the
> current one and others just a couple of weeks. There's no guarantee
> that those disparate versions will actually work together properly, in
> fact, it's very likely that things will break. It sure doesn't get
> tested.
>
> Going back to the previous version of a particular package is useful
> when there's a regression in the latest version, but doing the same
> across the whole distro, not so much. Cygwin 1.5 and setup-legacy.exe
> is the way to go if you want something old and unsupported that
> actually works.
>
> Question: would anyone miss the "Prev" button if it were to disappear?
>
I agree with eliminating it.
=20
...Karl=20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -