Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/08/27/14:24:37
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
|
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
|
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTikzTw8e7zKAUaMak5H8P2WRJwr5GzW4hyuk1pAQ@mail.gmail.com>
|
References: | <i4f3ve$uoq$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4C6B16A2 DOT 6000509 AT redhat DOT com> <AANLkTinAWLxfE0KcQMhD0jAfXAygYNW1WfO3ZJMJ0UpM AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTikzTw8e7zKAUaMak5H8P2WRJwr5GzW4hyuk1pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
|
Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:24:25 +0100
|
Message-ID: | <AANLkTi=6j5z96r9VErrgPHTX2g_FAxJQmTHiJ7jY-B8o@mail.gmail.com>
|
Subject: | Re: Upgrading to cygwin 1.7.6 vs gcc 4.5
|
From: | Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
|
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
|
X-IsSubscribed: | yes
|
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
|
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com>
|
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
|
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
|
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
|
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
|
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
|
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
|
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
|
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
|
On 18 August 2010 21:19, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 18 August 2010 06:25, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> On 18 August 2010 00:09, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 08/17/2010 04:54 PM, Ross Smith wrote:
>>>> I've installed the experimental gcc 4.5 packages (because that's the
>>>> version I'm using in all my other development environments, and it's
>>>> nice not to have to target multiple compiler versions any more), but now
>>>> that cygwin dll 1.7.6 is out, I can't seem to find a way to upgrade
>>>> cygwin without also downgrading gcc. In the installer, if I select
>>>> Current I get the new cygwin but the old gcc, while if I select
>>>> Experimental, it keeps the new gcc but doesn't offer me the new cygwin.
>>>>
>>>> At the moment I'm sticking with the old cygwin, because the gcc upgrade
>>>> is more important to me than the cygwin upgrade. Is there some way I'm
>>>> missing to select both, or do I just have to accept that I can't upgrade
>>>> anything else until the official gcc 4.5 is ready?
>>>
>>> Stay on the 'Curr' (not 'Exp'), click 'View' until you are on the
>>> Pending page, then cycle on the string next to each gcc package until it
>>> says Keep instead of the downgraded version number.
>>
>> I'd recommend selecting the 'Exp' button actually. That ensures that
>> all dependencies of gcc, e.g. libgcc and libffi, are upgraded to 4.5
>> too. (It's yet another flaw of setup.exe that it doesn't automatically
>> upgrade dependencies of experimental versions accordingly.)
>
> Scratch that. I hadn't realised that if you select 'Exp',
> non-experimental packages no longer get updated, which of course is
> exactly what the OP was saying.
This should be fixed in the newly uploaded setup.exe 2.721.
Andy
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -